SB7078113th GA (Historical)Introduced

Amends TCA Section 33-3-206.

Present law requires a professional to take reasonable care to predict, warn of, or take precautions to protect an identified victim from a service recipient's violent behavior if, and only if, (i) the recipient has communicated to the qualified mental health professional or behavior analyst an actual threat of bodily harm against a clearly identified victim and (ii) the professional, using the reasonable skill, knowledge, and care ordinarily possessed and exercised by the professional's specialty under similar circumstances, has determined or reasonably should have determined that the recipient has the apparent ability to commit such an act and is likely to carry out the threat unless prevented from doing so.<br /> <br /> This bill rewrites the above provisions to provide, instead that, the professional or analyst must (i) take reasonable care to predict, warn of, or take precautions to protect the identified victim or group of people from a service recipient's violent behavior and (ii) report the threat to the department of mental health and substance abuse services or the local law enforcement agency with jurisdiction over the municipality or county of residence of the recipient if, and only if:<br /> <br /> (1) The recipient has communicated to the professional or analyst (i) an intent for or perceived actual threat of bodily harm against a clearly identified victim or (ii) an intent for or perceived actual threat of bodily harm against a group of people, including, but not limited to, students at a day care or school, people at a place of worship, and members of the recipient's family; and<br /> <br /> (2) The professional or analyst, using the reasonable skill, knowledge, and care ordinarily possessed and exercised by the professional's or analyst's specialty under similar circumstances, has determined or reasonably should have determined that the recipient has the apparent ability to commit such an act.<br /> <br /> This bill clarifies that a professional or analyst who acts or makes a reasonable attempt to act in accordance with this bill is not liable for damages in a civil action, subject to prosecution in a criminal proceeding, or subject to disciplinary action by a regulatory board for such act or reasonable attempt to act.<br /> <br /> ON AUTUST 28, 2023, THE HOUSE ADOPTED AMENDMENT #1 AND PASSED HOUSE BILL 7008, AS AMENDED.<br /> <br /> AMENDMENT #1 makes the duty to warn dependent on a service recipient's communication of an intent for an actual threat of bodily harm, so that the duty is not triggered by communication of a perception of a threat.<br /> <br /> This amendment removes prediction of violent behavior as a component of the duty to warn.<br /> <br /> This amendment revises the duty to report to require that, once the duty is triggered, the provider must report the threat to:<br /> <br /> (1) The local law enforcement agency with jurisdiction over the municipality or county of residence of the service recipient; or<br /> <br /> (2) If the threat is general and not imminent or clearly identified, 988, or local crisis response service.<br />

What moved, what's on next week's agenda, new filings — every Monday, from the public record, free.

No account. Unsubscribe in one click.

Overview

Present law requires a professional to take reasonable care to predict, warn of, or take precautions to protect an identified victim from a service recipient's violent behavior if, and only if, (i) the recipient has communicated to the qualified mental health professional or behavior analyst an actual threat of bodily harm against a clearly identified victim and (ii) the professional, using the reasonable skill, knowledge, and care ordinarily possessed and exercised by the professional's specialty under similar circumstances, has determined or reasonably should have determined that the recipient has the apparent ability to commit such an act and is likely to carry out the threat unless prevented from doing so.<br /> <br /> This bill rewrites the above provisions to provide, instead that, the professional or analyst must (i) take reasonable care to predict, warn of, or take precautions to protect the identified victim or group of people from a service recipient's violent behavior and (ii) report the threat to the department of mental health and substance abuse services or the local law enforcement agency with jurisdiction over the municipality or county of residence of the recipient if, and only if:<br /> <br /> (1) The recipient has communicated to the professional or analyst (i) an intent for or perceived actual threat of bodily harm against a clearly identified victim or (ii) an intent for or perceived actual threat of bodily harm against a group of people, including, but not limited to, students at a day care or school, people at a place of worship, and members of the recipient's family; and<br /> <br /> (2) The professional or analyst, using the reasonable skill, knowledge, and care ordinarily possessed and exercised by the professional's or analyst's specialty under similar circumstances, has determined or reasonably should have determined that the recipient has the apparent ability to commit such an act.<br /> <br /> This bill clarifies that a professional or analyst who acts or makes a reasonable attempt to act in accordance with this bill is not liable for damages in a civil action, subject to prosecution in a criminal proceeding, or subject to disciplinary action by a regulatory board for such act or reasonable attempt to act.<br /> <br /> ON AUTUST 28, 2023, THE HOUSE ADOPTED AMENDMENT #1 AND PASSED HOUSE BILL 7008, AS AMENDED.<br /> <br /> AMENDMENT #1 makes the duty to warn dependent on a service recipient's communication of an intent for an actual threat of bodily harm, so that the duty is not triggered by communication of a perception of a threat.<br /> <br /> This amendment removes prediction of violent behavior as a component of the duty to warn.<br /> <br /> This amendment revises the duty to report to require that, once the duty is triggered, the provider must report the threat to:<br /> <br /> (1) The local law enforcement agency with jurisdiction over the municipality or county of residence of the service recipient; or<br /> <br /> (2) If the threat is general and not imminent or clearly identified, 988, or local crisis response service.<br />

Track Tennessee Legislation Like a Pro

Join hundreds of professionals using LegisGo to stay ahead of legislative changes.

Instant Alerts

Get notified when bills you track move through the legislature

AI Summaries

Understand complex legislation in seconds with AI-powered analysis

Full Access

All 132 legislators, committee schedules, and voting records

Sponsor

Unknown

Details
Session

113th General Assembly

Introduced

August 21, 2023

Subjects
31403135

Want to track this bill? Get instant alerts and AI-powered insights.